4 hole throttle bodies all too big?
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra or other non-B&G code configuration or tuning, please post them at http://www.msextra.com The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
4 hole throttle bodies all too big?
I'm also thinking about taking an old Holley, gutting it and epoxying all the holes shut, then I would just have to get creative to make it turn a TPS. Has anyone had success with that?
I don't want to use a conventional Ford style TB because I want the stock air cleaner look (it's a classic mustang) and don't really want to put a throttle cable on it.
Thanks
Erik
-
MegaScott
- MegaSquirt Guru
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:35 am
- Location: Seattle, Washington USA
- Contact:
http://www.auto-nomics.com/index.html
(Note that one of the effects of having too big a flowrate through the throttle body is that the car accelerator is either "ON" or "OFF" - the throttle will be so sensitive that that you won't be able to accurately regulate the throttle in between the closed and wide open throttle positions).
-
eliotmansfield
- Helpful Squirter
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:39 am
- Location: Milton Keynes - UK
- Contact:
4 hole throttle bodies all too big?
Â
You can also convert them to a progressive throttle action, which makes controlling the power much easier. Details here:
www.mez.co.uk/turbo9.html
Â
I also bored mine out to 41mm, as the std 33mm looked a bit small.
Â
Eliot.
Posted by email.
I am going to be running around on a Th2004R (which is very similar to the TH700R4 - same detent cable configuration) and what you have posted for the required bracket geometry is EXACTLY was I looking for!
(This has been a matter of concern fo rme since I got the TBs back in October of last year. I wasn't quite sure if that lower mounting hole would work as a viable Detent cable mounting location. But now I know it doesn't and I will be modifiying my TBs to your specifications. Again, Props to Eliot!
(BTW...check this site out for my installation... hehe)
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2101029/1 )
HTH,
David
Progessive throttle control is tackled by Holley through mechanical means - like the progessive linkage modification note previously.
However, the 4 barrel Rochester Quadrajets (E4ME, E4MC, etc.) handle the progressive problem with two mechanisms:
1) Progressive linkage by similar means as Holley and the modification
2) A spring-loaded air valve positioned at the top of the progessively controlled bores (now reffered to as "secondaries") and dampened by a vacuum actuator (also known as a "dashpot") with a small restrictor in the line.
#2 is a pretty clever design that only supplies air "on-demand" and has been proven successful since the 70's. (Of course now the question becomes "why not just modify a quadrajet E4ME to be a throttle body?? Hell, it even has a TPS sensor built in already!!") The force of the air rushing through the secondaries forces the air flaps or valves open, and the speed of the opening is controlled by the dashpot which alleviates the "stumble" when you put the pedal to the metal. The dashpot speed control is merely an small orifice that delays the vacuum signal applied to the dashpot. For quicker opening the orifice can be enlarged...
It would be interesting to add-on an air valve from a quadrajet to the Autonomics unit seeing as the dashpot is still available at auto parts stores. Or maybe the vacuum actuation mechanism from a vacuum secondary Holley?(see follwoing pics) Also check out this link.
http://www.tocmp.com/manuals/Carbs/Rochester/QJet/
