The MegaSquirt Project has experienced explosive growth other the years, with hundreds of new MS installations occurring every week - a phenomenal success! MegaSquirt has been successfully used in all aspects of Internal Combustion engine applications including R&D, Industry, Race, and Research. The MS project has transformed itself from a simple R&D project into a full-featured mature engine control system. To reflect this the support structure has also changed to meet the needs of MegaSquirt Users.
Moving forward, the R&D forums for MegaSquirt project are in a read-only mode - no new forum posts are accepted.
However the forums will remain available for view, they still contain a wealth of information on how MegaSquirt works, how it is installed and used. Feel free to search the forums for information, facts, and overview.While the R&D forum traffic has slowed in recent years, this is not at all a reflection of Megasquirt users, which continue to grow year after year. What has changed is that the method of MegaSquirt support today has rapidly moved to Facebook, this is where the vast majority of interaction is happening now. For those not on Facebook the msextra forums is another place for product support. Finally, for product selection assistance, all of the MegaSquirt vendors are there to help you select a system, along with all of the required pieces to make it complete.
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra or other non-B&G code configuration or tuning, please post them at http://www.msextra.com The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
In the cranking fuel tables, is the number in the table the actual pulsewidth, or is the offset added on top of the table value? The reason I ask is I want to know if I need to scale it directly, or subtract it from the offset and then scale that number. Thanks, got my 85 lb/hr's so I can run e85 later, and fixing to drop them in. In my case, it will make a huge difference, because the offset is already close to the same as my warm cranking pulsewideth.
Got it running. It looks like they were the actual pulsewidth
It is amazing how well the ms2 handles injectors that large. I had to bump the offset down from 1 to .9 , but it is happily idling with a 14.0: 1 afr (same as before), and the pulsewidth is only 1.4 msec at idle. This is with 85lb/hr injectors (that is close to 900cc for you metric types) on a 2.3 liter engine.
Not really that big, the 52's that were in there were almost big enough. I am wanting to run flex fuel (or at leat ethanol sometime). I came across an unbelievable deal on these injectors, so just though I might as well go big. The car probably makes about 300 rwhp on the pump gas safe tune, and on race gas or ethanol could probably get close to 400. With ethanol these will be probably at a 80% duty cycle.
I'm pimping 96's on a 1.9 lawl. I can't turn the fuel down enough. It idles at 1500 and won't go higher then 12.8:1. I wish I had flex fuel in the area...the the higher amount of feal you need to inject with flex, I should be sitting pretty with a good a/f .... but the closet FF station is about 4-5 hours from here
S.Bretz wrote:I'm pimping 96's on a 1.9 lawl. I can't turn the fuel down enough. It idles at 1500 and won't go higher then 12.8:1. I wish I had flex fuel in the area...the the higher amount of feal you need to inject with flex, I should be sitting pretty with a good a/f .... but the closet FF station is about 4-5 hours from here
Have you tried bumping down the injector offset (and obviously the pwm high current time to the same amount)? Then again 96's on a 1.9 are pretty huge. How much power are you making, and what kind of engine is it?
If you study the link I gave you in the other thread, you'll realize that the injectors are way too big for MS-I, which can only adjust the fuel in 0.1 millisecond steps. MS-II can adjust the fuel in .001 millisecond steps (100 times better), so it would work better (and is what wes kiser is running).
wes kiser wrote:Got it running. It looks like they were the actual pulsewidth
It is amazing how well the ms2 handles injectors that large. I had to bump the offset down from 1 to .9 , but it is happily idling with a 14.0: 1 afr (same as before), and the pulsewidth is only 1.4 msec at idle. This is with 85lb/hr injectors (that is close to 900cc for you metric types) on a 2.3 liter engine.
That's good to hear, since I picked up 85lbers for my truck, and I was afraid that it might be tough to tune, since they're bigger than what I currently need. I got the MSII tho, for just that reason. Glad to hear that it can handle it. I'll be installing it next month, then the fun begins