That TachRef plot looks better, and the polarity looks OK too. The issue with the VR sensor might be crankshaft end float, too large a wheel, or a non concentric wheel. I do know norzilla had issues with his hall effect cam sensor on VR2 and a VR crank sensor, but this was at a specific rpm, like 800vtwin had beyond his expected redline, and these were noise/AC spike related IIRC. I had problems with cranking rpms, due to inadequate cam sensor VR peak to peak voltages, because the sensor gap was too large and the cranking speed necessary to make the required voltages was outside the rpm of the starter. It is possible following on from my experiences, that compression loads slowing the crank down, also vary the peak to peak voltages, as well as the spacings (which you would expect) and so that is why you are seeing greater peak to peak variances....one way to see if this is the case, is pull the plugs out and do a cranking test, or record a datalog.evanevan wrote:...I found out that I've been struggling most of this time with bad wires off the VR sensor, when the trigger cover is torqued on us loses VR sync sporadically leave it loose and cranking stays steady. The tooth analyzer looks much better as well:
I also had issues with my shared grounds (pin31) which I altered with a diode
I would still try and do a datalog, as now you are getting cranking rpms, you should be able to record the other info, like trigger± and tachCount etc, which will be your next step in diagnosing your problems.






