predictor algorithms

For discussing MicroSquirt (TM) configuration and tuning of fuel parameters (including idle valves, etc.).
Forum rules
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra or other non-B&G code configuration or tuning, please post them at http://www.msextra.com The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
wes kiser
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:49 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Post by wes kiser »

After reading this post I swtiched from 1rst high, 2nd low to 1rst derivative, and ALL of my problems went away.

I had been having low rpm missfires, tach jumps, and detonation at boost onset around 3000 rpm even with drastically reduced timing. Changing the predictor algorithm fixed it all.

I think we definately need to play with this parameter more to find out what is ideal for different setups.
2.3t Swapped RX-7, s200g turbo, ms3 sequential, LS2coils
daniel505gti
MegaSquirt Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 11:15 pm

Post by daniel505gti »

Ms2 V3 with a locked dizzy hall sensor.
I am going to switch to crank trigger.
I was using last interval but went to first derivative. With little worse of but I think I have excessive dizzy drive movement.
danc8000
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 12:23 pm

Post by danc8000 »

I am running MS2 V3.0 with a 36-1 VR combo. At the moment it's for fuel only.

I have an occasional stumble at idle and am running 1sr Deriv 2nd Low.

I will have a play with these and report back soon...
Philip Lochner
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 138
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:18 am
Location: South Africa

Re: predictor algorithms

Post by Philip Lochner »

I have since again tried the other algorithms.

Last interval and 1st derivative seems to work fine.

1st High and 2nd derivative definitely results in poor idle.
Kind regards
Philip
Land Rover Discovery '95 4.6 V8i MS-2/V3/2.36/LC-1/EDIS
Jaguar XJS V.12 5.3, MS-2(2.686t11 - Dual table)/Dual LC-1/MSD6A/spark(VR/dissy)+fuel(LoZ+PWM)
Philip Lochner
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 138
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:18 am
Location: South Africa

predictor algorithms

Post by Philip Lochner »

OK, as far as I'm concerned MS-2 (2.35) DEFINITELY has only ONE predictor algorithm that really works : Last interval.

Since my previous post on this subject I've had my car on 1st Derivative as I thought that worked as well as LI (or better??), even at idle, and it does, UNTIL I SWITCH THE AC ON. That additional load somehow upsets the algorithm and results in really bad idle with much reduced RPM with unstable AFR. Opening throttle a tiny bit settled things down (this is where RPM based IAC could perhaps help) but I could not get my AFR at idle better than 13.

With Last interval, I've managed to get AFR up to 14 and ROCK STEADY. Idle RPM is also rock steady at 10BTDC and when the AC kicks in, Ive set my timing table so timing goes to 17BTDC (due to increase in MAP) and AFR is still steady at 14. Idle speed only drops by 50rpm or so
Kind regards
Philip
Land Rover Discovery '95 4.6 V8i MS-2/V3/2.36/LC-1/EDIS
Jaguar XJS V.12 5.3, MS-2(2.686t11 - Dual table)/Dual LC-1/MSD6A/spark(VR/dissy)+fuel(LoZ+PWM)
wes kiser
Helpful Squirter
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:49 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Post by wes kiser »

I switched mine to last interval, and it is better than first derivative, but first derivative appeared usable, 1rst high, 2nd low was not.
2.3t Swapped RX-7, s200g turbo, ms3 sequential, LS2coils
Post Reply