Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:17 am
by ronsonol
Yes its easier to answer some questions after reading what Lance has to say. I've learned a bunch from hours of reading his docs and posts.
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:24 pm
by Jon k
ronsonol wrote:Yes its easier to answer some questions after reading what Lance has to say. I've learned a bunch from hours of reading his docs and posts.
I am trying - I am good with physical stuff but the timing stuff confuses me so I hope everyone can bear with me.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:19 am
by ubercamaro
NP, we've all been there.
OK, so i looked at the export .vex file and it doesn't correlate to the spreadsheet, i.e. an advance of 30 KPA at 800 RPM is 31 degrees doesn't equal a similar value in the .vex files.
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:42 am
by blueman803
Hey, I thought I would help you out and added the conditional statements for the boosted area. You meant the max the angle should retard to should be half the 100 kpa angle, correct?
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:56 am
by ubercamaro
blueman803 wrote:Hey, I thought I would help you out and added the conditional statements for the boosted area. You meant the max the angle should retard to should be half the 100 kpa angle, correct?
blueman803 - right, the amount of retard in timing shouldn't be more that 1/2 of the ignition advance at 100 KPA.
I'll download your sheet and check it out.
Thanks for contributing!
Re: initial ignition table generator in MS Excel
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:32 pm
by houlster
ubercamaro wrote:everyone,
attached is a spreadsheet i made using some assumptions and calculations from lance.
Where is the attachment?