The MegaSquirt Project has experienced explosive growth other the years, with hundreds of new MS installations occurring every week - a phenomenal success! MegaSquirt has been successfully used in all aspects of Internal Combustion engine applications including R&D, Industry, Race, and Research. The MS project has transformed itself from a simple R&D project into a full-featured mature engine control system. To reflect this the support structure has also changed to meet the needs of MegaSquirt Users.
Moving forward, the R&D forums for MegaSquirt project are in a read-only mode - no new forum posts are accepted.
However the forums will remain available for view, they still contain a wealth of information on how MegaSquirt works, how it is installed and used. Feel free to search the forums for information, facts, and overview.While the R&D forum traffic has slowed in recent years, this is not at all a reflection of Megasquirt users, which continue to grow year after year. What has changed is that the method of MegaSquirt support today has rapidly moved to Facebook, this is where the vast majority of interaction is happening now. For those not on Facebook the msextra forums is another place for product support. Finally, for product selection assistance, all of the MegaSquirt vendors are there to help you select a system, along with all of the required pieces to make it complete.
Forum rules
Forum rules
Read the manual to see if your question is answered there before posting. If you have questions about MS1/Extra or MS2/Extra or other non-B&G code configuration or tuning, please post them at http://www.msextra.com The full forum rules are here: Forum Rules, be sure to read them all regularly.
I've tried searching without much luck. My question is has anyone been able to use ms for fuel control only, allowing the stock ecu to record from its sensors? Thanks in advance!
I dont know the details but if you put resistors of the same value as the injectors in place of the injectors the computer will still think that it is controlling everything. also i think all 4 O2 sensors and other sensors need to be in place and hooked up. Talking about faking the OBDII signal to the diagnostic computer that the emissions place uses is strictly off limits on these boards. I am unsure if even this is ok... the admins may delete this post and thats ok but i have seen this posted about before but I don't know if they got deleted. It's somewhat of a touchy subject.
______________________
Richard
DarkStar Media LLC
Inline Idle Air Control Valve Housings now availible through Jerry at DIYAutoTune.com
The way that OBDII systems work, terminating the injector connection with resistors would only (possibly) remove the injector warning. The mixtures would all be out of control as far as the analysis system is concerned so things like the cat convertor checks and other checks where the ecu commands altered operating conditions and observes the response would fail. I doubt there would be much that could be done to get around this and retain satisfactory OBDII checks...
Exeter: (noun) the nut or bolt always left over after putting something back together (Douglas Adams, The meaning of Liff)
yes, you're up a creek on that one. The amount of effort it would take to fool the computer is beyond worth while. It would be way easier to simply make a circuit to mimick the OBD2 side of the OE computer to say "alls OK!" to the scanner....thats all that really matters as far as that level of emissions testing.
It sucks, our state went to OBD2 code checking/ready test checking also. Older cars are exempt though (pre-95), so the simple answer is, own an older car...but they still have to pass the sniff test, but thats much easier to pass.