Wide band relationship to actual combustion mixture.
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:54 pm
I have a couple of questions about mixture and O2 sensors. I'm running a wide-band LC-1 sensor.
Can you actually get a lean signal if you run way, way to rich? IE: if you dump so much fuel into the cylinder that combustion doesn't happen, will you still get a rich signal. I would think there would be even more oxygen than if you were running the right mixture since it's just passing straight through the cylinder w/o burning.
Also, how does an O2 sensor actually read O2? Is it just a percentage of oxygen contained in the "gas packet" that flows over the sensor? So if you're burning gasoline and you're running 14.7 a/f ratio, is there a drastically different amount of oxygen in that "gas packet" than if you were burning say, ethanol, at 14.7 a/f ratio?
Ethanol has a stoich a/f ratio of ~9. So if you ran gasoline at 14.7:1, and ethanol at 9:1, which "gas packet" that the O2 sensor reads would have more oxygen?
Maybe it's more accurate to talk about lambda instead of a/f ratio?
Can you actually get a lean signal if you run way, way to rich? IE: if you dump so much fuel into the cylinder that combustion doesn't happen, will you still get a rich signal. I would think there would be even more oxygen than if you were running the right mixture since it's just passing straight through the cylinder w/o burning.
Also, how does an O2 sensor actually read O2? Is it just a percentage of oxygen contained in the "gas packet" that flows over the sensor? So if you're burning gasoline and you're running 14.7 a/f ratio, is there a drastically different amount of oxygen in that "gas packet" than if you were burning say, ethanol, at 14.7 a/f ratio?
Ethanol has a stoich a/f ratio of ~9. So if you ran gasoline at 14.7:1, and ethanol at 9:1, which "gas packet" that the O2 sensor reads would have more oxygen?
Maybe it's more accurate to talk about lambda instead of a/f ratio?