VR2+ sensitivity
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:51 am
Based on my previous experiences with GTS1000s using a cased MicroSquirt, I get no cranking rpms in TS using a good battery on my red GTS1000 now, so I suspect the cam sensor to cam lobe clearance on this engine is greater 0.5mm, and it's outside the limit of the starter motor cranking rpms.
Turns out it the same issue as the black GTS1000. Cover to cam lobe 27.42mm, sensor body to cover 25.4mm and tip protrudes 1.1mm, that's 26.5mm in total...so the cam lobe to sensor clearance is 0.92mm. The crank generates a good pulse on VR1+ from a slightly bigger gap, but the cam sensor VR2+ doesn't. On my other engines I have had to skim the cam sensor flange and reduce it down to about 0.3mm to get cranking rpms to register under closed throttle, about 240 rpm.
So this seems to be a lack of sensitivity issue on VR2+ circuit, as VR1+ picks up a more than adequate signal from a virtually identical sensor. As I want to use the Module board soon, I am wondering whether the VR2+ circuit is the same, and can it be modded easily if not, to make it more sensitive, so I don't have to keep skimming my cam covers?
Turns out it the same issue as the black GTS1000. Cover to cam lobe 27.42mm, sensor body to cover 25.4mm and tip protrudes 1.1mm, that's 26.5mm in total...so the cam lobe to sensor clearance is 0.92mm. The crank generates a good pulse on VR1+ from a slightly bigger gap, but the cam sensor VR2+ doesn't. On my other engines I have had to skim the cam sensor flange and reduce it down to about 0.3mm to get cranking rpms to register under closed throttle, about 240 rpm.
So this seems to be a lack of sensitivity issue on VR2+ circuit, as VR1+ picks up a more than adequate signal from a virtually identical sensor. As I want to use the Module board soon, I am wondering whether the VR2+ circuit is the same, and can it be modded easily if not, to make it more sensitive, so I don't have to keep skimming my cam covers?